Opinion

Yes vote for dialogue

If you vote yes next week to keep MPIRG on campus, as I hope you will, it is not the end of a conversation. Rather, you’re allowing conversations about MPIRG’s role on campus to continue. Our purpose is to represent the student voice.

We know we haven’t been perfect in fulfilling this role. In recognition of critiques we’ve received, we want to keep looking for ways to do our job better. We’ll be renegotiating our contract with MCSG after the referendum, and there is room for change.

Want to see changes in the contract, like making sure we have to do more publicity around the opt-out? Email your class rep! MPIRG and MCSG will look at suggestions together during the negotiations. Beyond contract negotiations, if you have problems with our campaigns or how we run them, or if you have ideas about new things we could do, please reach out to us. We want to work for and with you. But we can only do this if you let us, by voting yes.

Amy McMeeking, MPIRG co-chair

November 14, 2014

17 COMMENTS ON THIS POST To “Yes vote for dialogue”

  1. Pingback: click here now
  2. Pingback: Mitch Brownlie
  3. Functions anyone got any accurate success through HARO? It only seems that many of the reporters attached with the organization are from the united states which have no much focuses on from other countries primarily in South Asia. Brian, can you really immediate myself to any circumstance studies? Thanks.

  4. I must say i appreciate this post. I have already been looking all over because of this! Thank God I came across it on Search engines. You have made my day! Thanks again..

  5. Pingback: streetblog.pl/
  6. Pingback: 바카라사이트

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *