By Will Howell
You don?TMt know Representative Dan Severson (R), and he doesn?TMt know you. But he doesn?TMt want you to vote in Minnesota.House File 686, which he introduced on Feb. 3, would strip college students living on campuses of their right to vote. The bill says that ?oe[a] student does not acquire residence in the precinct where the student?TMs dormitory?Ýis located unless there is evidence that the?Ýhousing will be?Ýpermanent.??
I cannot possibly think of a scenario in which I live permanently in a dorm, and I would assume that many others feel the same way. So that means we would not be able to vote.
But before he singles-out college students, he makes a more general statement about voting residency: ?oeAn individual does not acquire a residence in any precinct of this state if the individual is living there only temporarily, without the intention of making that precinct home.??
Which begs the question: what is permanent housing, exactly? It could be interpreted to exclude any one who does not stay in any one building for too long?”anyone who does not establish a niche in a local community.
And that seems to be the rationale behind the bill: stop people who have not demonstrated investment or participation in the system from voting. (I asked Representative Severson to comment on his reasons for introducing the bill, but he did not return my e-mail or call.) As a social group, young people tend to move a lot, and, whatever the reason?”time, energy, frustration with current political trends?”we don?TMt invest very much of ourselves in our government.
And yet we demand so much. We need a stable economy so we can be employed. We need student loans to help us obtain education. We need healthcare coverage, cheap housing, good public transportation. We want a clean environment and beautiful public spaces.
But we don?TMt participate civically.
So while my first desire is to get mad, huff and puff and demand an explanation of why our voting rights are being threatened, I can understand Representative Severson?TMs motivation. It?TMs still dead wrong, but I can understand his motivation.
It?TMs a philosophy I heard applied quite frequently after George Bush won reelection last year. In his Prairie Home Companion broadcast following the election, Garrison Keillor joked that he didn?TMt think evangelical Christians should be allowed to vote because their citizenship was in heaven. Around campus, I heard numerous complaints or jokes directed at the uninformed voters who chose the president.
Any of us who thought that way were thinking just like Representative Severson. We saw a group who made a decision which affected us all without fully informing themselves, without being involved in the issues, and we posited that they should not be allowed to vote. Unlike Representative Severson, we had no plans to pursue the disenfranchisement of these voters.
So Mac, let?TMs show Representative Severson that his attack on college voting is misdirected. Let?TMs show him that we care about the issues affecting this city, this state, and this country, that we are informing ourselves and participating in our government. Let?TMs take a stand against this bill with the knowledge and activism for which Macalester is famous.
Contact Will Howell ?TM08 at [email protected].
Joan Kerr • Sep 11, 2019 at 10:20 pm
Aw, this was a very good post. Spending some time and actual effort to generate a very good article… but what can I say… I hesitate a whole lot and never seem to get nearly anything done.
Eric Howard • Sep 10, 2019 at 3:58 pm
I have been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the web will be much more useful than ever before.
Rebecca MacLeod • Sep 9, 2019 at 2:18 am
Your home is valueble for me. Thanks!…